miércoles, 14 de noviembre de 2012

The Recent Unpleasantness - Truth and Charity Forum

The Recent Unpleasantness - Truth and Charity Forum:

On November 6, the citizens of the United States re-elected perhaps the most anti-Catholic president in its history to a second term.
Even sadder, according to exit polls a majority of Catholics voted in his favor, even after they theoretically had imbibed the bishops’ message, conveyed from the pulpit and in various other media, that no Catholic should vote for a candidate who favors abortion rights and single sex marriage and does not support religious liberty.
What is going on here? Clearly, to borrow a line from the film “Cool Hand Luke,” “What we have here is a failure to communicate.”
Simply put, the U.S. is no longer “exceptional.”
In fact, the U.S. is no longer a Christian country. Our nation is in a spiraling decline, and the cause is neither politics nor economics but moral breakdown.
For the first time in human history the greatest health problem is obesity—read gluttony. Millions of men and even (believe it or not) women are addicted to pornography, and our birthrate is at its lowest in history. Cohabitation before marriage and multiple divorces are not unusual. Out-of-wedlock births are at an all-time high. And the holocaust of unborn babies by the millions continues.
Our country is morally as well as fiscally broke. Of course, these signs of decline are all interconnected. This is not the time to go into how all this came about, but to my mind the individual states have become too dependent on our central government for matters that should fall in their own purview, clearly and seriously violating and abusing the Catholic principle of subsidiarity.
The former freedom of action of individuals and families has been restricted by and over-regulated by Washington, DC. Remember, whatever the government can do for you, it can do to you.
In short, after witnessing the transformation of the American Republic into an Empire, we are witnessing that Empire’s fall. And as a Church historian, I do not know of any empire that ever collapsed and then revived.
I hope all this does not leave you too depressed: For my part, I am exhilarated.
To paraphrase a great American Revolutionary War hero, John Paul Jones, “We have not yet begun to fight.” Or as legendary Marine Chesty Puller put it: “They are in front of us, behind us, and we are flanked on both sides by an enemy that outnumbers us 29:1. They can’t get away from us now.”
This is the true “Catholic Moment” for our country, with apologies to my deceased friend Fr. Richard John Neuhaus, Catholic convert and founder of First Things. Simply said, only raw, unadulterated, lived-out-in-the-middle-of-the-world Catholicism can save the United States and perhaps bring us back to a country that acknowledges the natural law, truly takes as its guide the American Constitution, and renounces the allure of empire, returning to its conception as the humble Republic our forefathers founded.
Our role models are the first Christians who suffered and flourished and grew under at least 25O years of persecution, in some cases bloody, in other cases consisting of ostracism and second-class citizenship, until the Edict of Milan under the Emperor Constantine. Less than 70 years later, Catholicism had become the official religion of the Empire. We know the rest of the story: the conversions of the barbarians to the Faith over seven centuries and the flowering of what became Christendom or the West.
But I must stress that, as mainstream Protestantism for all practical purposes is dead in the United States. It is up to lay Catholics to build a healthy Catholic culture here worthy of the nation’s founding. The means will be their commitment to the Sacraments, life of prayer, and meditation on Sacred Scripture, and their bringing the fruits of these to their work, family life, and fellow citizens.
The Second Vatican Council, whose fiftieth anniversary we are celebrating in this special “Year of Faith,” was quite clear that its main message for us Catholics was the “universal call to holiness.”
If we take that call seriously and we live it like the first Christians did, well, we may make America again merit the title of “exceptional,” not only in emphasizing freedom for its people but in showing charity and respect for the dignity of all human persons, born and unborn, from conception until natural death.
Perhaps our rejection of the Culture of Death in the United States will bring about what the Lord wanted and wants: “That all may be one.” Indeed this is the Catholic moment when we can   anticipate many conversions to the Faith from evangelical Christians and other truth seekers.
Consider what our most insightful observer, Alexis de Tocqueville, had to say in the early 19th century when he traveled extensively through the U.S.:
At the present time, more than in any preceding age, Roman Catholics are seen to lapse into infidelity, and Protestants to be converted to Roman Catholicism. If you consider Catholicism within its own organization, it seems to be losing; if you consider it from outside, it seems to be gaining. Nor is this difficult to explain. The men of our days are naturally little disposed to believe; but as soon as they have any religion, they immediately find in themselves a latent instinct that urges them unconsciously towards Catholicism. Many of the doctrines and practices of the Roman Catholic Church astonish them, but they feel a secret admiration for its discipline, and its great unity attracts them. If Catholicism could at length withdraw itself from the political animosities to which it has given rise, I have hardly any doubt but that the same spirit of the age which appears to be so opposed to it would become so favorable as to admit of its great and sudden advancement.
The future is ours! We can and must believe what Pope Benedict XVI told Americans in 2008 re-echoing the vision of the late Blessed Pope John Paul II: “God is preparing a new springtime for Christianity.”
Meanwhile, let’s get to work and remember to pray for the conversion of our newly re-elected president and vice president! Miracles happen!
Fr. C. J. McCloskey III, S.T.D. is a Church historian and Research Fellow at the Faith and Reason Institute in Washington, DC. From 1985-1990, he was a chaplain at Princeton University. He is perhaps best known for guiding into the Church such luminaries as Dr. Bernard Nathanson, Lawrence Kudlow, Robert Novak, Judge Robert Bork, and Senator Sam Brownback. His articlesreviews, and doctoral thesis have been published in major Catholic and secular periodicals, including: Catholic World ReportFirst ThingsLa'Osservatore RomanoThe Wall Street JournalNational Catholic Register, the Washington Times, the Washington Post, the New York Times, and ACEPRENSA. Father John has done extensive work in radio and television, most notably at EWTN and as a commentator on network television, satellite and cable channels. He is co-author (with Russell Shaw) of Good News, Bad News: Evangelization, Conversion, and the Crisis of Faith (Ignatius Press) and the co-editor of "The Essential Belloc" (St. Benedict's Press). He is has also contributed a principal essay to the Cardinal Newman Society's "How to Choose a Catholic College" available from TheNewmanGuide.com.

'via Blog this'

jueves, 5 de julio de 2012

The Golden Age Cometh

The Golden Age Cometh: Fr. C. John McCloskey III considers our new “Catholic Moment”: the Catholic Church is the only option for serious Christians in the U.S.A.


THURSDAY, 05 JULY 2012
The Golden Age ComethPrintE-mail
By Fr. C. John McCloskey III   
21
My friend, the late Fr. John Richard Neuhaus, was a Lutheran minister from Canada and a great Christian witness who converted to Catholicism. I was privileged to be at his ordination to the priesthood.
Fr. Neuhaus proclaimed in one of his books the advent of a “Catholic Moment” for the United States. As it turns out, he was twenty-five years or so ahead of his time. But perhaps today’s “Catholic Moment” is not exactly the kind that he foresaw.
Neuhaus (along with George Weigel and Michael Novak) was generally positive about the American experiment and its “exceptionalism,” especially in contrast with decaying and now largely post-Christian Europe.
In 1996, however, responding to the infamous Planned Parenthood v. Casey Supreme Court decision, Neuhaus published an essay by Russell Hittinger in First Things, which concluded:
In effect, the Court makes it impossible to have anything other than a procedural common good as a motive or purpose for political activity. There is a real possibility that the moral and religious motivations of some citizens will become not only actionable at public law, through constitutional suits challenging legislation informed by such motives, but also actionable at private law. Unless the elected representatives of the people can compel the Court to refrain from invalidating political activity merely on the basis of the citizens’ moral or religious motivation, the task of reform is blocked. Should that continue, the option remaining to right reason is the one traditionally used against despotic rule: civil disobedience.
Fast forward now to 2012. Hittinger appears vindicated, especially following the Supreme Court’s recent decision to uphold Obamacare, although the lawsuits against the infamous HHS Mandate and the results of the November 2012 elections still lie before.
Given the despotic HHS administrative diktat, American Catholics may now find that the right to religious freedom founded in the First Amendment may no longer apply to them and their institutions. In fact, it’s possible that even the free practice of the faith may be moving toward de jure or de facto nonexistence.
Like Christians under the rule of Islamic governance or during the Roman Empire before Constantine’s edict of toleration, there may come a time when American Catholics become secondhand citizens at best, at risk of imprisonment or worse at the whim of the magistrates. We should continue to pray that such a day won’t come. But it is not impossible. Yes: It can happen here!

     The welcoming arms of Bernini’s Colonnade seen from St. Peter’s dome
I should clarify whom I am including when I use the word “Catholic” because, of course, there is much confusion in this area. I believe the best definition – full assent to the Faith – is neatly summarized in the RCIA’sReception for Baptized Christians into the Church: “I believe and profess all that the holy Catholic Church believes, teaches, and proclaims to be revealed by God.”
Readers may judge from the polls how many among us really qualify as Catholics according to this definition, considering the high number of divorces and remarriages, the dwindling of Catholic births and baptisms, the vertiginous drop in Mass attendance, etc. But there are certainly far fewer than the 70 million or so often quoted, just extrapolating from the percentage of votes by nominal Catholics for candidates with views clearly opposed to Catholic moral teaching (and who presumably live accordingly).
May they all soon return to the Church, as unlikely as that may now seem. Currently, one in every ten Americans is a lapsed Catholic. And each year, for every one convert to the Church, three leave the fold.
But this is precisely where the going gets good for the Church in the United States. Increasingly, the Catholic Church is the only option for serious Christians here. Traditional Protestant denominations are shrinking and Evangelical Christians in many cases are attracted to the sacramental system of the Church and its authoritative teachings. We get their best, and they get our worst, who do not want to live up to the full range of demands on the Christian life.
The seminaries are now generally sound, vocations are on the rise, and the episcopate is mostly made up of men in line with the evangelizing Catholicism of Bl. John Paul and the deep liturgical teachings of Pope Benedict.
Catholic radio is increasingly present almost everywhere. Catholic publishing continues to grow on- and off-line. The Cardinal Newman Society colleges grow each year and with time will replace the apostate former “Catholic” universities, whose now-diluted Catholicism we don’t need.
Liturgies in our parishes are now more traditional – in many places the Lord is once again worshiped in a more reverent setting and adored in the centered tabernacle.
Finally, we face life-changing threats to the practice of our Faith, which, paradoxically, has its positive side. That may be our great opportunity to bear witness, as did the first Christians, and to draw converts, even if it means martyrdom.
I say: Bring it on, if it be God’s will. Just think of the reward! In any case, it would not be the first time we’ve had to face and overcome such challenges. The best still lies ahead.
 
Rev. C.J. McCloskey III is a Church Historian in his hometown of Washington, D. C. and a fellow of the Faith and Reason Institute.
 
© 2012 The Catholic Thing. All rights reserved. For reprint rights, write to:info@frinstitute.org
 
The Catholic Thing is a forum for intelligent Catholic commentary. Opinions expressed by writers are solely their own.

lunes, 2 de julio de 2012

Why Catholics make the sign of the cross

Why Catholics make the sign of the cross

Why Catholics make the sign of the cross

Six overlooked ways in which making the ancient sign opens Catholics to life-transforming graces

By Bert Ghezzi - OSV Newsweekly, 3/25/2012
pope signing cross
Pope Benedict XVI makes the sign of the cross during a 2010 general audience in Paul VI Hall at the Vatican. CNS photo by Paul Haring
I used to make the sign of the cross casually as a nice gesture for beginning and ending my prayers. But about a decade ago, probably nudged by the Holy Spirit, I took it more seriously.  
I began to sign myself more frequently with faith and reverence. I did not think much about it, but after a year I noticed that I seemed to be doing measurably better in my Christian life. I was praying with more passion, resisting my bad inclinations somewhat more effectively, and relating to others more kindly.  
When I asked myself what had produced these positive results, I decided the only thing I was doing differently was praying the Sign of the Cross more fervently. Pretty good, I thought, for just signing myself reverently, and I realized that the Sign of the Cross is not merely a pious gesture. It is a powerful prayer. So I studied about it in Scripture, the Church Fathers and saints, and Catholic teaching.  
In my study, I discovered six perspectives on the Sign of the Cross that revealed why making it opens us to life-transforming graces. I share them here, confident that once you grasp them, you will make the gesture with more faith and experience its great blessings. 
Mini-creed
The Sign of the Cross is a profession of faith in God as he revealed himself. It serves as an abbreviated form of the Apostles’ Creed. Touching our forehead, breast and shoulders, we declare our belief in the Father, Son and Holy Spirit. We are announcing our faith in what God has done — the creation of all things, the redemption of humanity from sin and death, and the establishment of the Church, which offers new life to all. When we sign ourselves we are making ourselves aware of God’s presence and opening ourselves to his action in our lives. That would be enough, wouldn’t it? But there is much, much more. 
Six Signings
I invite you right now to imprint in your heart these six truths about the Sign of the Cross by making it with me six times, each time applying one of the perspectives.  
 
First, let’s sign ourselves professing our faith in God.
 
Second, let’s mark our selves remembering that we died with Christ in baptism.
 
Third, let’s make the sign to declare that we belong to Christ and that we will obey him.
 
Fourth, let’s sign ourselves to embrace whatever suffering comes and to celebrate our suffering with Christ for the Church.
 
Fifth, let’s make the sign of the cross as a defense against the devil and as an offensive advance of God’s kingdom against him.
 
Sixth, let’s make it to crucify our flesh and to put on Christ and his behaviors.
 
Renewal of baptism
First-century Christians began making the sign of the cross as a reminder and renewal of what happened to them when they were baptized. It still works the same way for us. When we sign ourselves we are declaring that in baptism we died sacramentally with Christ on the cross and rose to a new life with him (see Rom 6:3-4 and Gal 2:20). We are asking the Lord to renew in us those baptismal graces. We are also acknowledging that baptism joined us to the body of Christ and equipped us for our role of collaborating with the Lord in his work of rescuing all people from sin and death. 
Mark of discipleship
At baptism the Lord claimed us as his own by marking us with the Sign of the Cross. Now, when we sign ourselves, we are affirming our loyalty to him. By tracing the cross on our bodies, we are denying that we belong to ourselves and declaring that we belong to him alone (see Lk 9:23). The Church Fathers used the same word for the Sign of the Cross that the ancient world employed to indicate ownership. The same word named a shepherd’s brand on his sheep, a general’s tattoo on his soldiers, a householder’s mark on his servants, and the Lord’s mark on his disciples. So signing ourselves recognizes that we are Christ’s sheep and can count on his care; his soldiers, commissioned to work with him in advancing his kingdom on earth; and his servants, dedicated to doing whatever he tells us. 
Acceptance of suffering
Jesus promised us, that suffering would be a normal part of a disciple’s life (see Lk 9:23). So, when we mark our bodies with the sign, we are embracing whatever pain comes as a consequence of our faith in Christ. Making the sign is our “taking up the cross and following” him (Lk 9:23). But at the same time it comforts us with the realization that Jesus, who endured the crucifixion for us, now joins us in our suffering and supports us. Signing ourselves also announces another significant truth: With St. Paul, we are celebrating that our afflictions as members of the body of Christ contribute to the Lord’s saving work of perfecting the Church in holiness (see Col 1:24). 
Move against the devil
When the devil sent Jesus to the cross, he mistakenly believed he had won a great victory. Instead, the Lord surprised him with an ignominious defeat (see 1 Cor 2:8). From the first Easter morning through the present, the sign of the cross makes the devil cower and flee. So on one level, making the sign is a defensive move, declaring our inviolability to the devil’s influence. But more importantly, the sign is also an offensive weapon, helping us reclaim with Christ all that Satan lost at the cross. It announces our cooperation with him in the indomitable advance of the kingdom of God against the kingdom of darkness. 
Victory over the flesh
In the New Testament, the word flesh sums up all the evil inclinations of our old nature that persist in us even after we die with Christ in baptism (see Gal 5:16-22). Making the sign of the cross expresses our decision to crucify these desires of the flesh and to live by the Spirit. Like tossing off a dirty shirt or blouse, making the sign indicates our stripping ourselves of our evil inclinations and clothing ourselves with the behaviors of Christ (see Col 3: 5-15). 
The Church Fathers taught that the Sign of the Cross diffused the force of powerful temptations such as anger and lust. 
So no matter how strongly we are tempted, we can use the Sign of the Cross to activate our freedom in Christ and conquer even our besetting sins. 
Bert Ghezzi is the author of numerous books, including “The Sign of the Cross: Recovering the Power of the Ancient Prayer” (Loyola Press, $9.99).
See also:

domingo, 1 de julio de 2012

WOMAN OF STRENGTH

 
MUJER DE FUERZA vs MUJER FUERTE
La mujer de fuerza hace ejercicio todos los días para mantener su cuerpo en forma... pero la mujer fuerte se arrodilla a rezar para mantener su alma en forma.
La mujer de fuerza no le tiene miedo a nada... pero la mujer fuerte muestra valor en medio de su temor.
La mujer de fuerza nunca deja que nadie le gane, pero la mujer fuerte da lo mejor de sí a todos.
La mujer de fuerza comete errores y evita repetirlos en el futuro... pero la mujer fuerte se da cuenta de que los errores en la vida pueden también ser bendiciones de Dios y se apoya en ellos...
La mujer de fuerza pisa con seguridad... pero la mujer fuerte sabe que Dios la atajará si cae...
La mujer de fuerza se muestra confiada... pero la mujer fuerte muestra la gracia (de Dios) en su cara...
La mujer de fuerza tiene fe en que su fuerza durará todo lo necesario... pero la mujer fuerte tiene fe en que cuando lo necesite adquirirá la fortaleza.

martes, 10 de abril de 2012

Carta apostólica en forma de Motu proprio Porta fidei, 10 octubre 2011- Benedicto XVI

 
The Holy See
CARTA APOSTÓLICA
EN FORMA DE MOTU PROPRIO
PORTA FIDEI
DEL SUMO PONTÍFICE
BENEDICTO XVI
CON LA QUE SE CONVOCA EL AÑO DE LA FE

1. «La puerta de la fe» (cf. Hch 14, 27), que introduce en la vida de comunión con Dios y permite la entrada en su Iglesia, está siempre abierta para nosotros. Se cruza ese umbral cuando la Palabra de Dios se anuncia y el corazón se deja plasmar por la gracia que transforma. Atravesar esa puerta supone emprender un camino que dura toda la vida. Éste empieza con el bautismo (cf. Rm 6, 4), con el que podemos llamar a Dios con el nombre de Padre, y se concluye con el paso de la muerte a la vida eterna, fruto de la resurrección del Señor Jesús que, con el don del Espíritu Santo, ha querido unir en su misma gloria a cuantos creen en él (cf. Jn 17, 22). Profesar la fe en la Trinidad –Padre, Hijo y Espíritu Santo– equivale a creer en un solo Dios que es Amor (cf. 1 Jn 4, 8): el Padre, que en la plenitud de los tiempos envió a su Hijo para nuestra salvación; Jesucristo, que en el misterio de su muerte y resurrección redimió al mundo; el Espíritu Santo, que guía a la Iglesia a través de los siglos en la espera del retorno glorioso del Señor.
2. Desde el comienzo de mi ministerio como Sucesor de Pedro, he recordado la exigencia de redescubrir el camino de la fe para iluminar de manera cada vez más clara la alegría y el entusiasmo renovado del encuentro con Cristo. En la homilía de la santa Misa de inicio del Pontificado decía: «La Iglesia en su conjunto, y en ella sus pastores, como Cristo han de ponerse en camino para rescatar a los hombres del desierto y conducirlos al lugar de la vida, hacia la amistad con el Hijo de Dios, hacia Aquel que nos da la vida, y la vida en plenitud»[1]. Sucede hoy con frecuencia que los cristianos se preocupan mucho por las consecuencias sociales, culturales y políticas de su compromiso, al mismo tiempo que siguen considerando la fe como un presupuesto obvio de la vida común. De hecho, este presupuesto no sólo no aparece como tal, sino que incluso con frecuencia es negado[2]. Mientras que en el pasado era posible reconocer un tejido cultural unitario, ampliamente aceptado en su referencia al contenido de la fe y a los valores inspirados por ella, hoy no parece que sea ya así en vastos sectores de la sociedad, a causa de una profunda crisis de fe que afecta a muchas personas.
3. No podemos dejar que la sal se vuelva sosa y la luz permanezca oculta (cf. Mt 5, 13-16). Como la samaritana, también el hombre actual puede sentir de nuevo la necesidad de acercarse al pozo para escuchar a Jesús, que invita a creer en él y a extraer el agua viva que mana de su fuente (cf. Jn4, 14). Debemos descubrir de nuevo el gusto de alimentarnos con la Palabra de Dios, transmitida fielmente por la Iglesia, y el Pan de la vida, ofrecido como sustento a todos los que son sus discípulos (cf. Jn 6, 51). En efecto, la enseñanza de Jesús resuena todavía hoy con la misma fuerza: «Trabajad no por el alimento que perece, sino por el alimento que perdura para la vida eterna» (Jn6, 27). La pregunta planteada por los que lo escuchaban es también hoy la misma para nosotros: «¿Qué tenemos que hacer para realizar las obras de Dios?» (Jn 6, 28). Sabemos la respuesta de Jesús: «La obra de Dios es ésta: que creáis en el que él ha enviado» (Jn 6, 29). Creer en Jesucristo es, por tanto, el camino para poder llegar de modo definitivo a la salvación.
4. A la luz de todo esto, he decidido convocar un Año de la fe. Comenzará el 11 de octubre de 2012, en el cincuenta aniversario de la apertura del Concilio Vaticano II, y terminará en la solemnidad de Jesucristo, Rey del Universo, el 24 de noviembre de 2013. En la fecha del 11 de octubre de 2012, se celebrarán también los veinte años de la publicación del Catecismo de la Iglesia Católica, promulgado por mi Predecesor, el beato Papa Juan Pablo II,[3]con la intención de ilustrar a todos los fieles la fuerza y belleza de la fe. Este documento, auténtico fruto del Concilio Vaticano II, fue querido por el Sínodo Extraordinario de los Obispos de 1985 como instrumento al servicio de la catequesis[4], realizándose mediante la colaboración de todo el Episcopado de la Iglesia católica. Y precisamente he convocado la Asamblea General del Sínodo de los Obispos, en el mes de octubre de 2012, sobre el tema de La nueva evangelización para la transmisión de la fe cristiana. Será una buena ocasión para introducir a todo el cuerpo eclesial en un tiempo de especial reflexión y redescubrimiento de la fe. No es la primera vez que la Iglesia está llamada a celebrar un Año de la fe. Mi venerado Predecesor, el Siervo de Dios Pablo VI, proclamó uno parecido en 1967, para conmemorar el martirio de los apóstoles Pedro y Pablo en el décimo noveno centenario de su supremo testimonio. Lo concibió como un momento solemne para que en toda la Iglesia se diese «una auténtica y sincera profesión de la misma fe»; además, quiso que ésta fuera confirmada de manera «individual y colectiva, libre y consciente, interior y exterior, humilde y franca»[5]. Pensaba que de esa manera toda la Iglesia podría adquirir una «exacta conciencia de su fe, para reanimarla, para purificarla, para confirmarla y para confesarla»[6]. Las grandes transformaciones que tuvieron lugar en aquel Año, hicieron que la necesidad de dicha celebración fuera todavía más evidente. Ésta concluyó con la Profesión de fe del Pueblo de Dios[7], para testimoniar cómo los contenidos esenciales que desde siglos constituyen el patrimonio de todos los creyentes tienen necesidad de ser confirmados, comprendidos y profundizados de manera siempre nueva, con el fin de dar un testimonio coherente en condiciones históricas distintas a las del pasado.

LEER EL RESTO DEL DOCUMENTO: Carta apostólica en forma de Motu proprio Porta fidei, 10 octubre 2011- Benedicto XVI



'via Blog this'