jueves, 5 de julio de 2012

The Golden Age Cometh

The Golden Age Cometh: Fr. C. John McCloskey III considers our new “Catholic Moment”: the Catholic Church is the only option for serious Christians in the U.S.A.


THURSDAY, 05 JULY 2012
The Golden Age ComethPrintE-mail
By Fr. C. John McCloskey III   
21
My friend, the late Fr. John Richard Neuhaus, was a Lutheran minister from Canada and a great Christian witness who converted to Catholicism. I was privileged to be at his ordination to the priesthood.
Fr. Neuhaus proclaimed in one of his books the advent of a “Catholic Moment” for the United States. As it turns out, he was twenty-five years or so ahead of his time. But perhaps today’s “Catholic Moment” is not exactly the kind that he foresaw.
Neuhaus (along with George Weigel and Michael Novak) was generally positive about the American experiment and its “exceptionalism,” especially in contrast with decaying and now largely post-Christian Europe.
In 1996, however, responding to the infamous Planned Parenthood v. Casey Supreme Court decision, Neuhaus published an essay by Russell Hittinger in First Things, which concluded:
In effect, the Court makes it impossible to have anything other than a procedural common good as a motive or purpose for political activity. There is a real possibility that the moral and religious motivations of some citizens will become not only actionable at public law, through constitutional suits challenging legislation informed by such motives, but also actionable at private law. Unless the elected representatives of the people can compel the Court to refrain from invalidating political activity merely on the basis of the citizens’ moral or religious motivation, the task of reform is blocked. Should that continue, the option remaining to right reason is the one traditionally used against despotic rule: civil disobedience.
Fast forward now to 2012. Hittinger appears vindicated, especially following the Supreme Court’s recent decision to uphold Obamacare, although the lawsuits against the infamous HHS Mandate and the results of the November 2012 elections still lie before.
Given the despotic HHS administrative diktat, American Catholics may now find that the right to religious freedom founded in the First Amendment may no longer apply to them and their institutions. In fact, it’s possible that even the free practice of the faith may be moving toward de jure or de facto nonexistence.
Like Christians under the rule of Islamic governance or during the Roman Empire before Constantine’s edict of toleration, there may come a time when American Catholics become secondhand citizens at best, at risk of imprisonment or worse at the whim of the magistrates. We should continue to pray that such a day won’t come. But it is not impossible. Yes: It can happen here!

     The welcoming arms of Bernini’s Colonnade seen from St. Peter’s dome
I should clarify whom I am including when I use the word “Catholic” because, of course, there is much confusion in this area. I believe the best definition – full assent to the Faith – is neatly summarized in the RCIA’sReception for Baptized Christians into the Church: “I believe and profess all that the holy Catholic Church believes, teaches, and proclaims to be revealed by God.”
Readers may judge from the polls how many among us really qualify as Catholics according to this definition, considering the high number of divorces and remarriages, the dwindling of Catholic births and baptisms, the vertiginous drop in Mass attendance, etc. But there are certainly far fewer than the 70 million or so often quoted, just extrapolating from the percentage of votes by nominal Catholics for candidates with views clearly opposed to Catholic moral teaching (and who presumably live accordingly).
May they all soon return to the Church, as unlikely as that may now seem. Currently, one in every ten Americans is a lapsed Catholic. And each year, for every one convert to the Church, three leave the fold.
But this is precisely where the going gets good for the Church in the United States. Increasingly, the Catholic Church is the only option for serious Christians here. Traditional Protestant denominations are shrinking and Evangelical Christians in many cases are attracted to the sacramental system of the Church and its authoritative teachings. We get their best, and they get our worst, who do not want to live up to the full range of demands on the Christian life.
The seminaries are now generally sound, vocations are on the rise, and the episcopate is mostly made up of men in line with the evangelizing Catholicism of Bl. John Paul and the deep liturgical teachings of Pope Benedict.
Catholic radio is increasingly present almost everywhere. Catholic publishing continues to grow on- and off-line. The Cardinal Newman Society colleges grow each year and with time will replace the apostate former “Catholic” universities, whose now-diluted Catholicism we don’t need.
Liturgies in our parishes are now more traditional – in many places the Lord is once again worshiped in a more reverent setting and adored in the centered tabernacle.
Finally, we face life-changing threats to the practice of our Faith, which, paradoxically, has its positive side. That may be our great opportunity to bear witness, as did the first Christians, and to draw converts, even if it means martyrdom.
I say: Bring it on, if it be God’s will. Just think of the reward! In any case, it would not be the first time we’ve had to face and overcome such challenges. The best still lies ahead.
 
Rev. C.J. McCloskey III is a Church Historian in his hometown of Washington, D. C. and a fellow of the Faith and Reason Institute.
 
© 2012 The Catholic Thing. All rights reserved. For reprint rights, write to:info@frinstitute.org
 
The Catholic Thing is a forum for intelligent Catholic commentary. Opinions expressed by writers are solely their own.

lunes, 2 de julio de 2012

Why Catholics make the sign of the cross

Why Catholics make the sign of the cross

Why Catholics make the sign of the cross

Six overlooked ways in which making the ancient sign opens Catholics to life-transforming graces

By Bert Ghezzi - OSV Newsweekly, 3/25/2012
pope signing cross
Pope Benedict XVI makes the sign of the cross during a 2010 general audience in Paul VI Hall at the Vatican. CNS photo by Paul Haring
I used to make the sign of the cross casually as a nice gesture for beginning and ending my prayers. But about a decade ago, probably nudged by the Holy Spirit, I took it more seriously.  
I began to sign myself more frequently with faith and reverence. I did not think much about it, but after a year I noticed that I seemed to be doing measurably better in my Christian life. I was praying with more passion, resisting my bad inclinations somewhat more effectively, and relating to others more kindly.  
When I asked myself what had produced these positive results, I decided the only thing I was doing differently was praying the Sign of the Cross more fervently. Pretty good, I thought, for just signing myself reverently, and I realized that the Sign of the Cross is not merely a pious gesture. It is a powerful prayer. So I studied about it in Scripture, the Church Fathers and saints, and Catholic teaching.  
In my study, I discovered six perspectives on the Sign of the Cross that revealed why making it opens us to life-transforming graces. I share them here, confident that once you grasp them, you will make the gesture with more faith and experience its great blessings. 
Mini-creed
The Sign of the Cross is a profession of faith in God as he revealed himself. It serves as an abbreviated form of the Apostles’ Creed. Touching our forehead, breast and shoulders, we declare our belief in the Father, Son and Holy Spirit. We are announcing our faith in what God has done — the creation of all things, the redemption of humanity from sin and death, and the establishment of the Church, which offers new life to all. When we sign ourselves we are making ourselves aware of God’s presence and opening ourselves to his action in our lives. That would be enough, wouldn’t it? But there is much, much more. 
Six Signings
I invite you right now to imprint in your heart these six truths about the Sign of the Cross by making it with me six times, each time applying one of the perspectives.  
 
First, let’s sign ourselves professing our faith in God.
 
Second, let’s mark our selves remembering that we died with Christ in baptism.
 
Third, let’s make the sign to declare that we belong to Christ and that we will obey him.
 
Fourth, let’s sign ourselves to embrace whatever suffering comes and to celebrate our suffering with Christ for the Church.
 
Fifth, let’s make the sign of the cross as a defense against the devil and as an offensive advance of God’s kingdom against him.
 
Sixth, let’s make it to crucify our flesh and to put on Christ and his behaviors.
 
Renewal of baptism
First-century Christians began making the sign of the cross as a reminder and renewal of what happened to them when they were baptized. It still works the same way for us. When we sign ourselves we are declaring that in baptism we died sacramentally with Christ on the cross and rose to a new life with him (see Rom 6:3-4 and Gal 2:20). We are asking the Lord to renew in us those baptismal graces. We are also acknowledging that baptism joined us to the body of Christ and equipped us for our role of collaborating with the Lord in his work of rescuing all people from sin and death. 
Mark of discipleship
At baptism the Lord claimed us as his own by marking us with the Sign of the Cross. Now, when we sign ourselves, we are affirming our loyalty to him. By tracing the cross on our bodies, we are denying that we belong to ourselves and declaring that we belong to him alone (see Lk 9:23). The Church Fathers used the same word for the Sign of the Cross that the ancient world employed to indicate ownership. The same word named a shepherd’s brand on his sheep, a general’s tattoo on his soldiers, a householder’s mark on his servants, and the Lord’s mark on his disciples. So signing ourselves recognizes that we are Christ’s sheep and can count on his care; his soldiers, commissioned to work with him in advancing his kingdom on earth; and his servants, dedicated to doing whatever he tells us. 
Acceptance of suffering
Jesus promised us, that suffering would be a normal part of a disciple’s life (see Lk 9:23). So, when we mark our bodies with the sign, we are embracing whatever pain comes as a consequence of our faith in Christ. Making the sign is our “taking up the cross and following” him (Lk 9:23). But at the same time it comforts us with the realization that Jesus, who endured the crucifixion for us, now joins us in our suffering and supports us. Signing ourselves also announces another significant truth: With St. Paul, we are celebrating that our afflictions as members of the body of Christ contribute to the Lord’s saving work of perfecting the Church in holiness (see Col 1:24). 
Move against the devil
When the devil sent Jesus to the cross, he mistakenly believed he had won a great victory. Instead, the Lord surprised him with an ignominious defeat (see 1 Cor 2:8). From the first Easter morning through the present, the sign of the cross makes the devil cower and flee. So on one level, making the sign is a defensive move, declaring our inviolability to the devil’s influence. But more importantly, the sign is also an offensive weapon, helping us reclaim with Christ all that Satan lost at the cross. It announces our cooperation with him in the indomitable advance of the kingdom of God against the kingdom of darkness. 
Victory over the flesh
In the New Testament, the word flesh sums up all the evil inclinations of our old nature that persist in us even after we die with Christ in baptism (see Gal 5:16-22). Making the sign of the cross expresses our decision to crucify these desires of the flesh and to live by the Spirit. Like tossing off a dirty shirt or blouse, making the sign indicates our stripping ourselves of our evil inclinations and clothing ourselves with the behaviors of Christ (see Col 3: 5-15). 
The Church Fathers taught that the Sign of the Cross diffused the force of powerful temptations such as anger and lust. 
So no matter how strongly we are tempted, we can use the Sign of the Cross to activate our freedom in Christ and conquer even our besetting sins. 
Bert Ghezzi is the author of numerous books, including “The Sign of the Cross: Recovering the Power of the Ancient Prayer” (Loyola Press, $9.99).
See also:

domingo, 1 de julio de 2012

WOMAN OF STRENGTH

 
MUJER DE FUERZA vs MUJER FUERTE
La mujer de fuerza hace ejercicio todos los días para mantener su cuerpo en forma... pero la mujer fuerte se arrodilla a rezar para mantener su alma en forma.
La mujer de fuerza no le tiene miedo a nada... pero la mujer fuerte muestra valor en medio de su temor.
La mujer de fuerza nunca deja que nadie le gane, pero la mujer fuerte da lo mejor de sí a todos.
La mujer de fuerza comete errores y evita repetirlos en el futuro... pero la mujer fuerte se da cuenta de que los errores en la vida pueden también ser bendiciones de Dios y se apoya en ellos...
La mujer de fuerza pisa con seguridad... pero la mujer fuerte sabe que Dios la atajará si cae...
La mujer de fuerza se muestra confiada... pero la mujer fuerte muestra la gracia (de Dios) en su cara...
La mujer de fuerza tiene fe en que su fuerza durará todo lo necesario... pero la mujer fuerte tiene fe en que cuando lo necesite adquirirá la fortaleza.